My first
high school art teacher told the class something on the first day of school:
everything is art. No one really took
that seriously, we just filed that information in the back of our heads for
future tests or exams. Not until my
freshman year of college did I truly understand the phrase “everything is art”. There is an art to creating a pen, a shirt, a
rug, and a chair just like there is an art to making a beautiful painting,
photograph, drawing, or sculpture. While
most people do not fully appreciate every object in their environment, each and
every object was designed by an artist, such as the blue chairs with desks made
by Emilio Ambasz and Giancarlo Piretti.
You are
right, Jake, “most people have different opinions about what should or should
not be considered art”. Everyone has
their own opinion about art. For those
less educated in the arts they hear the word “art” and imagine the Mona Lisa or
a painter’s pallet and a paintbrush. For
some, art is fleeting and takes place in the moment, like a theatrical or
musical performance, while others’ ideas of art are limited to 2 dimensional
images on paper and canvas. The concept
of art is similar to the concept of a hero; they are both relative terms. A hero is determined not by his character or
strength; he is determined by someone recognizing him as his “hero”. One cannot be a hero without having a
“heroee” to say “he is my hero”. Art is
not art when no one can recognize it as art.
While that seems contradictory to my first message, everything is art,
the truth of the matter is there will always be someone somewhere out there who
can look at an image that no one else likes and see something good in it. There will always be a handful of nut jobs
who love the Trachtenburg Family Slideshow Players, likewise there will always
be someone to love every terrible piece of artwork ever made. Everyone has a different taste in
everything. My dad prefers funny
Hallmark cards while my mother enjoys heartfelt letters.
You bring
up a valid point about art that “it is almost unanimously agreed upon that it
needs to express something or have an emotional impact”. We try to find meaning in artwork and the
most famous pieces we are shown come with notes about a certain message in the
piece or collection. However we have no
way of knowing if these analyzed messages are really what the artists were
going for when they made their work.
Maybe Jackson Pollock just got bored and really liked annoying art
critiques in his time, we have no way to really know his goal for making art. Like I said before, everyone has a different
taste in everything. Some may experience
the feeling of peace when viewing Morandi’s still lifes while others are bored
and insulted by their lack of proper compositions. You’re right, no one can be objective about
an art piece because an artwork can be expressive for some and not for
others. It’s all a matter of opinion, so
there is no one person that can judge what art is good or bad.
I believe
that as students studying art we do not study what is art and what is not, we
study what is good art. Good art is just
another phrase explaining one’s opinion of a work. We can break a piece down into different
aspects and judge them based on set guidelines such as line quality, realism,
composition, etc., but we seem to learn most about the people that break the
rules of art. I agree that there is
value in discussing the credibility of a work of art, and I also agree that
there is no point to become aggressive about art upon which people may
disagree.
It is easy
to rant about this subject; some say you must follow the rules, others say some
rules can be broken, and still others say that only those who learn to break
rules in new ways are true artists. No
single opinion is correct, when you take all the differing opinions and add
them up everything is given the status of art.
I think what matters most isn’t what our professors tell us is art, but
what we view as meaningful to us. You
can look at Mondrian’s work for a few seconds and walk away bored, then look at
Leonardo DaVinci’s paintings and feel inspired.
All that matters is how you relate to artwork that inspires you. At the end of the day you won’t even care
about Mondrian’s work because Leonardo’s work is what spoke to you.